[neomutt-devel] mutt vs neomutt

ng0 ng0 at infotropique.org
Sun Jun 25 01:15:17 CEST 2017

Sven Guckes transcribed 1.9K bytes:
> hi!
> i see that all the debian packages
> of mutt are now all neomutt.
> install mutt - receive neomutt.
> this sounds all pretty confusing.
> so.. what are the plans here?
> will there be only one package?
> who will do the support? etc
> will there be a "native" mutt package again?
> Sven

I am not a neomutt developer.
I think it should be up to Debian to decide what they ship as mutt.
Mutt certainly still exists, neomutt recently forked to some degree
which flatcap or other developers can explain better.

Have you tried filing a bug at debian?
I know Gentoo has the same behavior, only with the system I use
(and more or less care for neomutt for) I haven't witnessed a
mixing of names.
OpenPG: A88C8ADD129828D7EAC02E52E22F9BBFEE348588
infotropique OS: https://www.infotropique.org
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.neomutt.org/pipermail/neomutt-devel-neomutt.org/attachments/20170624/de3e15c3/attachment.sig>

More information about the neomutt-devel mailing list